Mubarak and Clinton Address Settlements
Settlement Report | Vol. 6 No. 5 | September-October 1996- News
- Netanyahu Government Highlights Settlement Program
- Sharon Emerges as Key Player in Likud Settlement Policy
- To Our Readers
- Building Quietly on the Golan
- Palestinians Condemn Netanyahu's Settlement Actions
- Mubarak and Clinton Address Settlements
- Netanyahu Aims to Match Labor Settlement Record
- Back Panel Quote
On July 30, U.S. President Bill
Clinton and Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak were asked about the
Netanyahu government's settlement policies.
President Mubarak: First and
foremost, a just and fair peace must be based on a formula which was
proposed by the cosponsors of the Madrid Peace Conference of October
1991 and accepted by all parties. The core of this formula is Security
Council Resolutions 242, 338, and 425, and the principle of land for
peace and the joint political rights of the Palestinian people.
These terms of reference constitute the solid foundation of the peace
process. Hence, all the parties must abide by them. Activities which
are inconsistent with the requirements and spirit of peace, such as
settlement activities and the confiscation of lands, should be
terminated.
Q: President Clinton, President
Mubarak, a new plan by Israel to build new roads into the occupied
areas and new bridges seems to signal a return to a hard line by
Israel. My question very simply to both of you is, can there be peace
in the Middle East if the new Israeli prime minister carries out his
campaign promises to his own people?
President Clinton: Well, first
of all, I have, like you, seen the reports of the proposed
road-building campaign. But I do not--I don't know whether they're new
roads, expansions of existing roads, nor do we know for sure that the
government of Israel has adopted that policy. We know that--the report
is that a member of the government has proposed that. So until the
government of Israel adopts that as policy, it is--I don't want to
blame them for something they haven't done yet.
We are concerned about anything that could affect the peace process
adversely. And we expect and believe that Israel will adhere to the
agreements it has already made, including the Oslo Accords, the
agreements that were signed here. And the Prime Minister assured me
that that was so. So until I have evidence that that is not so, I don't
think I should go further.
I'm concerned about the reports I've read, but I don't know precisely
what the plan is, and my understanding is it has not yet been adopted
by the government. And the government's commitment is to continue the
peace process and not to do anything inconsistent with the commitments
made by the Israeli government before it. So we'll have to see what
happens.
Q: My question is for President
Clinton. It was reported yesterday that the Israeli government is
considering lifting the ban on the settlement activity. So if this
happened, what will be the U.S. position with regard to this issue? And
is this going to change its longstanding stand with regard to this
issue?
President Clinton: Well, first
of all, we haven't changed our positions on any issues as a result of
the election in Israel. Our positions are just what they were. So we
haven't changed. The settlement issue under the Oslo Accords is a
matter for determination between the parties as we move to the end of
the negotiations. And we have encouraged everyone not to do anything
which would weaken the chances of peace.
And so, again, we need to know exactly what it is they're thinking
about doing, because in the previous administrations, Prime Minister
Rabin and Prime Minister Peres, the existing settlements expanded more
or less with population growth in the State of Israel. And that was not
considered to be a serious violation of the understandings that were
existing at that time.
So before we--again, I say before I say anything I would need to know
exactly what it is they intend to do. But my position on these issues
is the same today as it was the day before the election in Israel. None
of our positions have changed and they won't change.
Washington, D.C., July 30, 1996
