Israel Wins U.S. Concessions on Loan Guarantees
Settlement Report | Vol. 5 No. 6 | November-December 1995
The Clinton administration
has notified Congress that Israel
will suffer a $60 million "settlement penalty" reduction from the $2
billion in loan guarantees Washington
made available in October. In 1994, the administration exacted a $311.8 million
penalty. For fiscal year (FY) 1993 the sum was $437 million. This year, the Clinton administration assessed Israel's
expenditures on settlements during that year at $303 million, but then restored
$243 million of the deducted amount to fully compensate Israel for
costs incurred in its redeployment in the Gaza-Jericho regions.
Israel's
minister of finance explained recently that the $303 million sum
reflects
routine non-construction-related expenses such as salaries of teachers,
nurses,
and other civil servants. During the foreseeable future, Israel's
Treasury Ministry expects Israel's expenditures on settlement-related
roads and infrastructure (not including expenditures relating to
Israel's redeployment)
in the occupied territories to be $200-$250 million annually.
The %10 billion program in U.S.
loan guarantees, spread out in equal installments over 5 years, was initiated
in 1992. The guarantees were devised as a means of supporting Soviet
immigration to Israel.
The economic rationale for the program, however, has always been less important
than the politics driving it, so much so that the Rabin government was recently
permitted to draw down the $10 billion over 6 years and to use the entire $4
billion annual load guarantee for FY 1996 and 1997 to guarantee the financing
of its national budget deficit. The decision can be seen as a vote of U.S. support
for the Labor government as it heads into its campaign for reelection.
As in years past, U.S.
calculations of Israel's
settlement expenditures excluded all private Israeli investment in the
territories. Therefore, almost every housing project that is being built
in settlements in East Jerusalem and throughout the West Bank by private
construction companies now proceeds without any U.S. penalty.
The exclusion of "private construction" represents yet another
retreat from principled U.S.
opposition to continuing settlement--a retreat that permitted the Rabin
government to continue building and settling at a pace rarely seen in almost
three decades of occupation.
Compensating Israel
for its expenditures on military redeployment resulting from negotiations with
the Palestinian Authority has been the subject of extended debate throughout
the last year between the State Department and Congressman Lee Hamilton
(D-Ind.). The former chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee
argued that this offset arrangement weakened the legislation's original
purpose--to demonstrate to Israel
that there were costs to continuing settlement expansion. (See Settlement
Report, November 1994.)
This year, unlike last year, Hamilton
was briefed in advance by Assistant Secretary of State Robert Pelletreau.
And this year, no hearings are scheduled by the Republican-controlled
committee.
News of the decision on penalties was released during ceremonies marking the
signing of the Oslo II accords. According to one congressional staffer,
critics like Hamilton
"couldn't make a case. It was not a time to be critical."
